Well if we are talking about the movie i like it, pit did amazing job....well actually the whole cast did. It be neat if they had "Fury 2" with a german cast in the Eastern front.
@GenObi said:
Well if we are talking about the movie i like it, pit did amazing job....well actually the whole cast did. It be neat if they had "Fury 2" with a german cast in the Eastern front.
there is a fury on the German side XD he's call Michael Wittman....and yes it would especially their story using the tiger
Fury: first part of the movie: quite excelent. Second part: omg seriously mess up your whole movie credibility with dumb and unrealistic last stand... such an anti climax!
First part was good, then I lost it when the AT guns missed like 10 shots in a row while the Shermans were going at like 5 mph TOWARDS them. Other than that it was a eh flick. The final part was pretty lame.
BaálthazorThe shoreline by the river Styx.Posts: 1,092
edited January 2018
Resurrecting dead threads is a bad thing, though because this part of the forum gets little attention I'm willing to roll with it...
The Tiger properly moved out of cover due to its cover being blown in the first place..!
Usually you ambush an enemy with maximum efficiency on the first punch(which it did!) and then you abandon your cover if it's only for camouflage purposes.. If you got a nice defensive position, then you stay, but the Tiger clearly did not... It was only camouflage and as such offered little in terms of protection, hence it moved out, so as to avoid being out-flanked by the more numerous Sherman's...
Though why it failed to reverse and circle in clear order when Pitt's Sherman circle strafed it, is another matter entirely...!!!
Honestly, why the Tiger only back up and NOT back n' circle is clearly a product of "Holywood" and it's "We can't let the MURICANS LOSE", THEME throughout the movie...
Not only was it NOT a folksturm battalion approaching them near the end, but an SS-battallion..! And at this stage of the war, only child-battalions and veteran SS-battalions existed... and the forces shown in the movie does NOT seem an awful lot like a "child-brigade", so it stands to reason that it was, in fact, a veteran one,which really begs the question; "Why are they so goddamn enept?!"
Comments
Please elaborate
This post makes no sense whatsoever
there is a fury on the German side XD he's call Michael Wittman....and yes it would especially their story using the tiger
Fury: first part of the movie: quite excelent. Second part: omg seriously mess up your whole movie credibility with dumb and unrealistic last stand... such an anti climax!
A great post, perhaps unintentionally. (Whitman's kill count is as fictional as the movie!)
First part was good, then I lost it when the AT guns missed like 10 shots in a row while the Shermans were going at like 5 mph TOWARDS them. Other than that it was a eh flick. The final part was pretty lame.
Aha ... and sometimes pretty much worse :-)) Shown in the "Fury" is a VERY light version of what happened in reality.
It was exciting but i found it more of a comedy because of it's historical inaccuracies.
Why the Tiger I moved to engage those Shermans out of cover is still beyond me
The Tiger properly moved out of cover due to its cover being blown in the first place..!
Usually you ambush an enemy with maximum efficiency on the first punch(which it did!) and then you abandon your cover if it's only for camouflage purposes..
If you got a nice defensive position, then you stay, but the Tiger clearly did not... It was only camouflage and as such offered little in terms of protection, hence it moved out, so as to avoid being out-flanked by the more numerous Sherman's...
Though why it failed to reverse and circle in clear order when Pitt's Sherman circle strafed it, is another matter entirely...!!!
Honestly, why the Tiger only back up and NOT back n' circle is clearly a product of "Holywood" and it's "We can't let the MURICANS LOSE", THEME throughout the movie...
Not only was it NOT a folksturm battalion approaching them near the end, but an SS-battallion..! And at this stage of the war, only child-battalions and veteran SS-battalions existed... and the forces shown in the movie does NOT seem an awful lot like a "child-brigade", so it stands to reason that it was, in fact, a veteran one,which really begs the question; "Why are they so goddamn enept?!"